Skip to main content

Which is better for authorizing an AI agent, a policy engine or Proofable?

A policy engine is better when your own team owns both the rules and every caller, and a log inside your infrastructure is enough evidence. Proofable is better when the decision has to be checked before the action runs and confirmed afterwards by a system you do not control.

It depends

Keep your policy engine if you already express your rules in it, one team owns both the rules and every caller, and a log inside your infrastructure is enough evidence. Add Proofable when the agent runs somewhere you do not own, when more than one party has to rely on the outcome, or when the evidence has to travel with the action. A policy engine decides; Proofable can supply the portable record that the decision was made under current permission. Teams that already have a policy engine usually keep it and add Proofable at the boundary, rather than replacing it.

What each one answers

Where they fit together

A policy engine is the right owner of your own rules. Proofable does not ask you to move them. It checks the agent’s limits at the action boundary and records the result, so the same decision can be appraised by a system that never saw your engine.
Your engine can still run before or after this check. Standards and interoperability lists the authorization and attestation layers Proofable works beside, including AuthZEN and AARM.

Next

Control agent actions

Every limit an agent can carry.

Reuse verification

Check once and reuse the result.

Prove what happened

Keep a record of each decision.

Standards

The layers beside Proofable.
Last modified on October 21, 2026